Peer Review Process

 
JAKMAN
Peer Review Process Proses Peer Review
JAKMAN applies a double-blind peer review process to maintain the quality, objectivity, relevance, and integrity of published articles. The identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from each other during the review process. JAKMAN menerapkan proses double-blind peer review untuk menjaga kualitas, objektivitas, relevansi, dan integritas artikel yang diterbitkan. Identitas penulis dan reviewer tidak saling diketahui selama proses penelaahan.
Review Model Model Penelaahan
Review Type: Jenis Review: Double-Blind Peer Review
Reviewers: Reviewer: At least two reviewers for each manuscript Minimal dua reviewer untuk setiap manuskrip
Initial Screening: Pemeriksaan Awal: Conducted by the editorial team Dilakukan oleh tim editorial
Final Decision: Keputusan Akhir: Made by the editor based on reviewers' recommendations and editorial evaluation Ditetapkan oleh editor berdasarkan rekomendasi reviewer dan evaluasi editorial
 
Review and Publication Workflow Alur Review dan Publikasi
01
Editorial Screening Pemeriksaan Editorial
The editorial team conducts an initial assessment of the manuscript to evaluate its relevance to JAKMAN's scope, compliance with the journal template and author guidelines, originality, completeness, research integrity, and general scholarly quality. Tim editorial melakukan pemeriksaan awal terhadap manuskrip untuk menilai kesesuaiannya dengan scope JAKMAN, kepatuhan terhadap template dan author guidelines, orisinalitas, kelengkapan, integritas penelitian, dan kualitas ilmiah secara umum.
Manuscripts that do not meet basic editorial requirements may be returned for technical correction or rejected before peer review. Manuskrip yang belum memenuhi persyaratan dasar editorial dapat dikembalikan untuk perbaikan teknis atau ditolak sebelum masuk ke tahap peer review.
02
Peer Review Penelaahan oleh Reviewer
Manuscripts that pass editorial screening are assigned to at least two reviewers with expertise relevant to the manuscript's subject area. JAKMAN applies a double-blind review process, meaning that the identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from each other. Manuskrip yang lolos pemeriksaan editorial ditugaskan kepada minimal dua reviewer yang memiliki keahlian sesuai bidang manuskrip. JAKMAN menggunakan double-blind review, sehingga identitas penulis dan reviewer tidak saling diketahui.
03
Editorial Decision Keputusan Editorial
After considering the reviewers' reports, manuscript quality, journal scope, research integrity, and editorial evaluation, the editor makes an editorial decision. Setelah mempertimbangkan laporan reviewer, kualitas manuskrip, kesesuaian dengan scope jurnal, integritas penelitian, dan evaluasi editorial, editor menetapkan keputusan terhadap manuskrip.
04
Copyediting & Production Copyediting & Produksi
Accepted manuscripts proceed to copyediting, language and consistency checking, reference verification, layout preparation, metadata completion, and final publication preparation. Manuskrip yang telah diterima dilanjutkan ke tahap copyediting, pemeriksaan bahasa dan konsistensi, verifikasi referensi, penyusunan layout, penyempurnaan metadata, dan persiapan publikasi.
05
Publication Publikasi
The final article is published in JAKMAN after completion of editorial and production checks. Published articles are made openly accessible under the CC BY 4.0 license. Artikel final diterbitkan di JAKMAN setelah seluruh pemeriksaan editorial dan produksi diselesaikan. Artikel yang diterbitkan tersedia secara terbuka berdasarkan lisensi CC BY 4.0.
Review Criteria Kriteria Penelaahan
✓ Relevance to JAKMAN's focus and scope Kesesuaian dengan fokus dan scope JAKMAN
✓ Originality and scientific contribution Orisinalitas dan kontribusi ilmiah
✓ Clarity of research problem, gap, and objectives Kejelasan masalah, research gap, dan tujuan penelitian
✓ Appropriateness and rigor of the method Ketepatan dan ketelitian metode penelitian
✓ Validity and clarity of results Validitas dan kejelasan hasil penelitian
✓ Depth of discussion and engagement with relevant literature Kedalaman pembahasan dan keterkaitan dengan literatur yang relevan
✓ Alignment between objectives, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion Keselarasan tujuan, metode, hasil, pembahasan, dan kesimpulan
✓ Quality and relevance of references Kualitas dan relevansi referensi
✓ Research ethics and publication integrity Etika penelitian dan integritas publikasi
Possible Editorial Decisions Kemungkinan Keputusan Editorial
Accept
The manuscript is accepted for publication. Manuskrip diterima untuk dipublikasikan.
Minor Revision
Limited revisions are required before acceptance. Diperlukan revisi terbatas sebelum manuskrip dapat diterima.
Major Revision
Substantial revision is required and the manuscript may be reassessed. Diperlukan revisi substansial dan manuskrip dapat dinilai kembali.
Reject
The manuscript does not meet the requirements for publication in JAKMAN. Manuskrip belum memenuhi persyaratan untuk dipublikasikan di JAKMAN.
Revision Process Proses Revisi
Authors receiving a revision decision are expected to address reviewers' and editors' comments carefully and systematically. A revised manuscript should be accompanied by a clear response explaining how each comment has been addressed or, where a suggestion is not followed, providing a scholarly justification. Penulis yang memperoleh keputusan revisi diharapkan menanggapi komentar reviewer dan editor secara cermat dan sistematis. Manuskrip revisi sebaiknya disertai respons yang menjelaskan bagaimana setiap komentar telah ditindaklanjuti atau, apabila suatu saran tidak diterapkan, memberikan alasan ilmiah yang memadai.
Confidentiality Kerahasiaan
Submitted manuscripts, review reports, reviewer identities, author information, editorial correspondence, and unpublished data must be treated as confidential throughout the review process. Manuskrip yang dikirimkan, laporan review, identitas reviewer, informasi penulis, korespondensi editorial, dan data yang belum dipublikasikan harus diperlakukan sebagai informasi rahasia selama proses penelaahan.
Conflict of Interest in Peer Review Konflik Kepentingan dalam Peer Review
Reviewers must disclose any financial, professional, institutional, collaborative, personal, or other relationship that could affect their impartiality. Reviewers should decline the assignment when an independent and objective review cannot reasonably be ensured. Reviewer wajib mengungkapkan hubungan finansial, profesional, institusional, kolaboratif, personal, atau hubungan lain yang dapat memengaruhi objektivitas penilaian. Reviewer harus menolak penugasan apabila review yang independen dan objektif tidak dapat dijamin.
Editorial Independence Independensi Editorial
Acceptance or rejection decisions are based on scholarly quality, relevance, originality, research integrity, methodological soundness, reviewer recommendations, and editorial judgment. Publication fees or other financial considerations do not determine editorial decisions. Keputusan penerimaan atau penolakan didasarkan pada kualitas ilmiah, relevansi, orisinalitas, integritas penelitian, ketepatan metodologis, rekomendasi reviewer, dan pertimbangan editorial. Biaya publikasi maupun pertimbangan finansial lainnya tidak menentukan keputusan editorial.
Quality, Relevance & Integrity Kualitas, Relevansi & Integritas
The peer review process is designed to support rigorous scholarly evaluation while protecting confidentiality, editorial independence, fairness, and research integrity. Reviewer recommendations inform editorial decisions, but the final responsibility for publication decisions rests with the journal's editorial team. Proses peer review dirancang untuk mendukung evaluasi ilmiah yang ketat dengan tetap menjaga kerahasiaan, independensi editorial, keadilan, dan integritas penelitian. Rekomendasi reviewer menjadi bahan pertimbangan keputusan editorial, namun tanggung jawab akhir atas keputusan publikasi berada pada tim editorial jurnal.
JAKMAN · Published by PT. Haruna Cipta Nusantara Diterbitkan oleh PT. Haruna Cipta Nusantara · Double-Blind Peer Review · CC BY 4.0